28 losses out of 30 checks: what happened to top traders' HYPE positions?

28 losses out of 30 checks: what happened to top traders' HYPE positions?

Why HYPE stayed negative for a group ranked by returns

The Satoshi Index was captured ten times between October 28 and November 2.

Each snapshot has a 24-hour, a 7-day and a 30-day top group, so there are 30 cells in all.

In each of those 30 cells we checked the unrealized P&L on top traders' Hyperliquid (HYPE) positions.

In 28 of them it was a loss. The only profits came in two 24-hour snapshots on October 28.

If top traders carried an unrealized loss for this long, did they misread HYPE?

Putting the numbers side by side, what stands out first is that long-heavy and short-heavy groups both lost, and the reason has to be sought in what kind of group each is.

1. On the morning of November 2, all three groups were in loss on HYPE

In the latest snapshot, at 6:47 a.m. KST on November 2, the three groups' HYPE unrealized P&L was as follows.

Unrealized P&L is the current gain or loss on positions not yet closed. It is not a realized result.

All three are negative. A group with a 3.5% long share and a group with a 37.4% long share lost alike.

Another point stands out: in all three groups, HYPE was the only asset with an unrealized loss above $10 million.

At the same moment, other top assets such as Bitcoin, Ether, ZEC and Solana showed no loss of this size.

The 7-day group had 106 long accounts and 60 short, the only one of the five top assets where long accounts outnumbered short. By notional, though, the long share was only 37.4%.

2. Across ten snapshots, only two cells showed a profit

Running the same check on all ten snapshots gives losses in 28 of 30 cells.

The exceptions are two 24-hour snapshots on October 28, with profits of about $7.32 million and $8.58 million.

That was when HYPE traded near $81.30. On the morning of October 30 it was $90.46, that evening $91.59, and on November 2 it was $87.86.

In under a week the price rose about 8% and then gave back part of it.

Whether that path lines up with the 28 losses is taken up in the next section. What can be confirmed now is only that the two profitable cells sit in the first snapshots, when the price was lowest.

3. A short-heavy group loses more when the price rises

Most of the groups with large HYPE losses held more on the short side.

A short position gets worse as the price rises. The move from the low $80s to the low $90s after October 28 runs in the same direction as those groups' losses.

The 30-day group shows the link more clearly. Its HYPE unrealized loss fell from about −$59.67 million on October 28 to −$39.4 million on November 2.

Over the same period its long share by notional rose from 3.3% to 19.6%. It is possible that shorts were cut and longs added, or that accounts with larger long exposure entered the ranking.

The 30-day group is not a fixed list either, so the two cannot be told apart. This record also cannot separate whether the smaller loss came from changed positions, a partly lower price or a changed membership.

4. Losses in a group with more long accounts show it is not just direction

Part of the picture is hard to explain by direction alone.

The 7-day group had more long accounts, yet its unrealized P&L on November 2 was −$11.6 million.

One clue is that account counts lean long while notional leans short. Large short positions may have produced most of the loss. This snapshot does not record which account lost how much.

It also cannot show how much the longs gained over the stretch where the price rose. The P&L is summed per asset, so long gains and short losses within a group are blended into one value.

So what this number shows is only that the top groups as a whole were losing on HYPE. Who lost, and why, is outside it.

5. A high rank and a profit on one asset are different things

A "top performer" rank is set by the performance of the whole account. An account can rank high with a loss on one asset if its gains elsewhere are larger.

So a large unrealized loss on HYPE does not mean top traders misjudged HYPE.

Nor does it mean the account as a whole is losing. The Satoshi Index's unrealized P&L is summed separately for each asset.

Even so, the number is not meaningless. It points to where among many assets the top groups are carrying weight, and why that asset looks different from the rest.

Three distinctions are worth asking about: which group the number belongs to, whether the loss sits on the long or the short side, and whether the loss belongs to the same people or to people newly ranked.

Wrapping up: the loss repeated across ten snapshots, but the reason remains open

• In 28 of 30 cells across ten snapshots and three groups, HYPE showed an unrealized loss.
• On the morning of November 2 it was −$25.4 million for 24 hours, −$11.6 million for 7 days and −$39.4 million for 30 days.
• Over the same period the HYPE price rose from $81.30 to $87.86.

An explanation that short-heavy groups' losses line up with the rising price is possible, but it does not fully cover the loss of a group with more long accounts.

Whose positions the HYPE losses came from is a question this record cannot yet answer.

---

Check it yourself in the Satoshi Index

The Satoshi Index ranks public accounts on Hyperliquid, Lighter, dYdX and Pacifica by 24-hour, 7-day and 30-day performance, then shows how much the top 100 traders hold long and short in each asset, and their unrealized P&L.

No login is needed to view it.

https://satoshinote.io/traders

FAQ

Is an unrealized loss a loss that has already been locked in?

No. Unrealized P&L is the gain or loss on positions not yet closed, at the current price. When the price moves, the same position's unrealized P&L changes.

If top traders lose on HYPE, is the whole account in loss?

Not necessarily. Rank is set by the performance of the whole account, and the Satoshi Index's unrealized P&L is summed per asset. A larger gain elsewhere can keep the rank high.

Do shorts always lose when there are many of them?

No. Shorts gain when the price falls. In this record, the larger losses in short-heavy groups may reflect HYPE's price rising over the same period.

---

Data basis: ten snapshots from 7:38 a.m. KST on October 28 to 6:47 a.m. KST on November 2. The top 100 accounts by 24-hour, 7-day and 30-day performance on Hyperliquid, Lighter, dYdX and Pacifica were summed by asset; rankings are recomputed every hour. Amounts are in US dollars with no exchange rate applied. HYPE prices are Hyperliquid mid prices. This is an analysis of market data, not investment advice.